top of page

How to Stand Out to Grant Reviewers With Strong Financials

Aug 28
15 min read

If you want to stand out to grant reviewers, your grant application has to make a strong impression quickly. Grant reviewers may be looking at hundreds or even thousands of applications, which means they may not fully read every narrative during that first review. Instead, they may skim the application to determine which organizations immediately stand out and deserve a closer look.

That makes your financial package especially important. Your organization needs to present financial information that is clear, organized, and easy to understand from the moment a reviewer opens the file. The goal is to make it immediately apparent that your organization is worth funding.

The good news is that standing out does not necessarily require something complicated. It starts with getting the financial foundations right.want



How to Stand Out to Grant Reviewers With Clear Financials

Your financial statements tell a story about your organization. Before a reviewer gets deep into your application narrative, your financials can already communicate whether your organization has clear accounting processes and understands how its money is being managed. Several areas deserve particular attention when you are preparing a grant application.


Start With Your Chart of Accounts

Your chart of accounts is the foundation for how your financial statements are structured. If your chart of accounts is messy or unorganized, that lack of clarity can show up when a grant reviewer looks at your financial statements.


One important example is the statement of activity.


The statement of activity should make it easy to understand:

  • How much money came into the organization

  • How much money the organization spent

  • What the organization spent that money on


The focus should be on clear, basic categories rather than getting into every small detail immediately. The example provided is straightforward: an organization brings in $10 million, spends $8.5 million, and the statement clearly shows where that money went.


The goal is simple: when someone opens your financials, they should not have to work hard to understand them.




Make Restricted and Unrestricted Funds Clear

Another important part of your financial package is making the difference between restricted and unrestricted funds clear on your balance sheet. A funder wants to understand what money your organization has available to spend and what money has specific requirements attached to it. This also gives the funder insight into your internal accounting processes. If restricted and unrestricted funds are mixed together or require a lengthy explanation, that can raise questions about whether your organization has a consistent internal process for tracking them.


That is why your month end close matters. When you close your books, determine what is restricted and what is not, then make sure that information is clearly reflected on the balance sheet.




QuickBooks Online and Fund Tracking

For organizations using QuickBooks Online, there is an additional consideration. QuickBooks Online is technically not set up specifically for fund tracking, so your accounting system needs to be structured to support the way your organization needs to track its funds. It is recommended to use classes for functional expenses and locations for fund tracking. The larger point is that your accounting system should support the financial information you need to present clearly when your organization is applying for grants.




Use Budget to Actuals to Tell the Full Story

Grantors will also look closely at your budget to actuals. This is an area where your financials and your narrative should work together. Your budget to actuals can reveal gaps between what you expected to happen and what is actually happening. For example, an organization might have projected $10 million in revenue but only be at $5 million more than halfway through the year. That difference could naturally create a question for a reviewer.


Instead of waiting for the funder to ask about the difference, address it in your narrative.

When preparing your financial package, review the numbers carefully and look for anything that stands out. Those are the areas your narrative should help explain.



Explain Significant Variances

The same approach applies to expenses. If an expense category is significantly over or under budget, consider whether your narrative needs to explain what happened. Salaries are one example. If a key person left and had to be replaced, and that person was significant to the organization's operations, that change could help explain a significant difference in salary expenses.

The point is not to hide something that looks unusual. It is to recognize it, understand it, and proactively provide the context. If something jumps out at you when you review the financial package, there is a good chance it will also jump out at the funder.




Make Overhead and Cost Allocation Crystal Clear

Overhead is another area that can create questions for grant reviewers. Overhead is commonly one of the more misunderstood areas of nonprofit accounting and explains that funders want to understand several things.

They want to see:

  • How much you have in overhead expenses

  • How those overhead expenses are being covered

  • Where those expenses are allocated

  • What funder or grant is paying for them

  • What function the expenses serve

A key point is understanding how much overhead is administrative, programmatic, or related to fundraising.


This is also why reviewing your statement of functional expenses throughout the year is important. Organizations should not necessarily wait until the end of the year to pull this statement. Reviewing it monthly can help identify situations where costs need to be adjusted or reallocated.

If your administrative expenses are genuinely on the higher side, explain why. Running an organization requires staff and other expenses, and your narrative can help the funder understand why those costs are important to the organization and why funding is needed.




Your Audit Report Can Strengthen Your Grant Application

Finally, consider your audit quality. Depending on the organization's size, an annual audit may be part of the organization's financial process, and grant applications may request an audit report. Organizations that have not reached the threshold requiring an audit may need to explain why they are not audited. Some organizations choose to be audited even when they have not reached the required threshold because an audit can make the organization look stronger to a funder.


Why does this matter?

Funders want to see that an independent assessment has been performed on the organization's finances and financial controls. The audit provides evidence that the organization has been evaluated in how it stewards its finances.

The quality of that audit report matters. A strong audit opinion can be a determining factor in whether an organization receives funding. And that means the work happening throughout the year matters too. Your day to day bookkeeping, accounting, month end close, and financial reviews all contribute to what ultimately appears in the audit.




Stay Grant Ready Before You Need to Be

The biggest lesson is that grant readiness is not something you should scramble to create when a grant opportunity appears. The financial foundations discussed here do not suddenly become important when your organization starts growing. They become more important as your organization grows. As your finances become more complex, problems with those foundational processes can become more complex too.


That is why you want to build these practices now.


If you are planning to apply for grants, or you are already applying, your goal should be to stay ready rather than constantly trying to get ready. Review your chart of accounts. Make sure restricted and unrestricted funds are clearly identified. Look at your budget to actuals. Review significant variances. Make sure your overhead and cost allocation are accurate and understandable. Pay attention to your audit quality. These foundational pieces can help your financial package tell a clearer story before a grant reviewer ever gets deep into your application.




Key Takeaway: Strong financial foundations help you stand out to grant reviewers

Your grant application is more than your narrative. Your financial package is part of the story you are telling about your organization.


When your financials are clear, your restricted and unrestricted funds are properly identified, your budget to actuals make sense, your cost allocation is appropriate, your overhead is explained, and your audit reflects strong financial stewardship, you give funders a clearer picture of your organization. Most importantly, do not wait until you need funding to start paying attention to these things.

Stay ready so you do not have to get ready.




Take the Next Step Toward Grant Readiness

If you are preparing your nonprofit for future grant opportunities, start by reviewing the financial foundations that funders are likely to see. Look at your financial package with fresh eyes. Ask yourself what would stand out if you were the person reviewing it for the first time. Then use your narrative to provide context for the questions your financials may naturally create. The goal is not simply to submit a grant application. The goal is to build an organization that is prepared to show funders that it is ready for the funding it is requesting. to stand out to grant reviewers, your grant application has to make a strong impression quickly. Grant reviewers may be looking at hundreds or even thousands of applications, which means they may not fully read every narrative during that first review. Instead, they may skim the application to determine which organizations immediately stand out and deserve a closer look.

That makes your financial package especially important. Your organization needs to present financial information that is clear, organized, and easy to understand from the moment a reviewer opens the file. The goal is to make it immediately apparent that your organization is worth funding.

The good news is that standing out does not necessarily require something complicated. It starts with getting the financial foundations right.

How to Stand Out to Grant Reviewers With Clear Financials

Your financial statements tell a story about your organization. Before a reviewer gets deep into your application narrative, your financials can already communicate whether your organization has clear accounting processes and understands how its money is being managed.

Several areas deserve particular attention when you are preparing a grant application.

Start With Your Chart of Accounts

Your chart of accounts is the foundation for how your financial statements are structured. If your chart of accounts is messy or unorganized, that lack of clarity can show up when a grant reviewer looks at your financial statements.

One important example is the statement of activity.

The statement of activity should make it easy to understand:

  • How much money came into the organization

  • How much money the organization spent

  • What the organization spent that money on

The focus should be on clear, basic categories rather than getting into every small detail immediately. The example provided is straightforward: an organization brings in $10 million, spends $8.5 million, and the statement clearly shows where that money went.

The goal is simple: when someone opens your financials, they should not have to work hard to understand them.

Make Restricted and Unrestricted Funds Clear

Another important part of your financial package is making the difference between restricted and unrestricted funds clear on your balance sheet.

A funder wants to understand what money your organization has available to spend and what money has specific requirements attached to it. This also gives the funder insight into your internal accounting processes.

If restricted and unrestricted funds are mixed together or require a lengthy explanation, that can raise questions about whether your organization has a consistent internal process for tracking them.

That is why your month end close matters.

When you close your books, determine what is restricted and what is not, then make sure that information is clearly reflected on the balance sheet.

QuickBooks Online and Fund Tracking

For organizations using QuickBooks Online, there is an additional consideration. QuickBooks Online is technically not set up specifically for fund tracking, so your accounting system needs to be structured to support the way your organization needs to track its funds.

The transcript specifically discusses using classes for functional expenses and locations for fund tracking.

The larger point is that your accounting system should support the financial information you need to present clearly when your organization is applying for grants.

Use Budget to Actuals to Tell the Full Story

Grantors will also look closely at your budget to actuals. This is an area where your financials and your narrative should work together.

Your budget to actuals can reveal gaps between what you expected to happen and what is actually happening. For example, an organization might have projected $10 million in revenue but only be at $5 million more than halfway through the year. That difference could naturally create a question for a reviewer.

Instead of waiting for the funder to ask about the difference, address it in your narrative.

When preparing your financial package, review the numbers carefully and look for anything that stands out. Those are the areas your narrative should help explain.

Explain Significant Variances

The same approach applies to expenses.

If an expense category is significantly over or under budget, consider whether your narrative needs to explain what happened. Salaries are one example. If a key person left and had to be replaced, and that person was significant to the organization's operations, that change could help explain a significant difference in salary expenses.

The point is not to hide something that looks unusual. It is to recognize it, understand it, and proactively provide the context.

If something jumps out at you when you review the financial package, there is a good chance it will also jump out at the funder.

Make Overhead and Cost Allocation Crystal Clear

Overhead is another area that can create questions for grant reviewers. The transcript identifies overhead as one of the more misunderstood areas of nonprofit accounting and explains that funders want to understand several things.

They want to see:

  • How much you have in overhead expenses

  • How those overhead expenses are being covered

  • Where those expenses are allocated

  • What funder or grant is paying for them

  • What function the expenses serve

That last point includes understanding how much overhead is administrative, programmatic, or related to fundraising.

This is also why reviewing your statement of functional expenses throughout the year is important. The transcript explains that organizations should not necessarily wait until the end of the year to pull this statement. Reviewing it monthly can help identify situations where costs need to be adjusted or reallocated.

If your administrative expenses are genuinely on the higher side, explain why. Running an organization requires staff and other expenses, and your narrative can help the funder understand why those costs are important to the organization and why funding is needed.

Your Audit Report Can Strengthen Your Grant Application

Finally, consider your audit quality.

Depending on the organization's size, an annual audit may be part of the organization's financial process, and grant applications may request an audit report. Organizations that have not reached the threshold requiring an audit may need to explain why they are not audited.

The transcript also points out that some organizations choose to be audited even when they have not reached the required threshold because an audit can make the organization look stronger to a funder.

Why does this matter?

Funders want to see that an independent assessment has been performed on the organization's finances and financial controls. The audit provides evidence that the organization has been evaluated in how it stewards its finances.

The quality of that audit report matters. A strong audit opinion can be a determining factor in whether an organization receives funding. And that means the work happening throughout the year matters too.

Your day to day bookkeeping, accounting, month end close, and financial reviews all contribute to what ultimately appears in the audit.

Stay Grant Ready Before You Need to Be

The biggest lesson is that grant readiness is not something you should scramble to create when a grant opportunity appears.

The financial foundations discussed here do not suddenly become important when your organization starts growing. They become more important as your organization grows. As your finances become more complex, problems with those foundational processes can become more complex too.

That is why you want to build these practices now.

If you are planning to apply for grants, or you are already applying, your goal should be to stay ready rather than constantly trying to get ready.

Review your chart of accounts. Make sure restricted and unrestricted funds are clearly identified. Look at your budget to actuals. Review significant variances. Make sure your overhead and cost allocation are accurate and understandable. Pay attention to your audit quality.

These foundational pieces can help your financial package tell a clearer story before a grant reviewer ever gets deep into your application.

Key Takeaway: Strong financial foundations help you stand out to grant reviewers

Your grant application is more than your narrative. Your financial package is part of the story you are telling about your organization.

When your financials are clear, your restricted and unrestricted funds are properly identified, your budget to actuals make sense, your cost allocation is appropriate, your overhead is explained, and your audit reflects strong financial stewardship, you give funders a clearer picture of your organization.

Most importantly, do not wait until you need funding to start paying attention to these things.

Stay ready so you do not have to get ready.

Take the Next Step Toward Grant Readiness

If you are preparing your nonprofit for future grant opportunities, start by reviewing the financial foundations that funders are likely to see.

Look at your financial package with fresh eyes. Ask yourself what would stand out if you were the person reviewing it for the first time. Then use your narrative to provide context for the questions your financials may naturally create.

The goal is not simply to submit a grant application.

The goal is to build an organization that is prepared to show funders that it is ready for the funding it is requesting.nprofit means balancing an incredible mission with countless operational responsibilities. You're leading programs, managing people, pursuing funding, and making decisions that affect your community every day.

But if I were your nonprofit controller, there are a few things I'd tell you as a nonprofit controller that could dramatically improve your organization's financial health.

None of these lessons are meant to criticize. They're based on years of working with dozens of nonprofit organizations and seeing the same financial challenges appear over and over again.

The encouraging part is that every one of these challenges can be fixed.

Let's walk through some of the biggest habits that hold organizations back—and what you can do differently.

Things I'd Tell You as a Nonprofit Controller About Reviewing Your Financials

One of the biggest misconceptions in nonprofit financial management is believing your accounting team can maintain perfectly accurate financials without your participation.

Your accounting team prepares reports, but you know your organization better than anyone else.

When monthly financial reports go unread or questions never get asked, important context gets lost. Then, when grant reports, funding applications, or audits suddenly require financial information, everything becomes urgent.

Organizations that regularly review their reports tend to identify issues early.

That means:

  • Asking questions when something doesn't look right

  • Providing feedback throughout the year

  • Sharing organizational updates that affect the numbers

  • Staying engaged with the financial reporting process

Reviewing your reports isn't just about checking a box. It's part of maintaining accurate financial records all year long.

Documentation Matters More Than Memory

Another important lesson is simple:

Financial transactions require documentation.

Accounting decisions shouldn't rely on conversations or assumptions alone.

If new funding is coming in, your accounting team needs the supporting documents—not just an email explaining what happened.

That includes items like:

  • Grant agreements

  • Contracts

  • Invoices

  • Supporting documentation

Without that backup, it's impossible to properly determine how something should be recorded.

Providing documentation from the beginning helps protect both your organization and your accounting team while creating a stronger foundation for compliance.

Why Internal Controls Protect Your Financial Reporting

One issue that creates unnecessary problems is making changes after the accounting team has already closed the books.

Changing transactions after month-end can create inaccurate financial statements, interrupt internal controls, and affect the organization's audit trail.

Sometimes a situation feels urgent, but not every correction belongs in a prior accounting period.

Instead of editing transactions independently, communicate changes with your accounting team first so they can determine the appropriate accounting treatment.

Strong financial reporting depends on consistent processes—not individual workarounds.

Help Your Accounting Team Help You

Many nonprofit leaders are incredibly busy.

That's understandable.

However, your accounting team shouldn't have to request the same documents month after month before receiving them.

Most organizations provide many of the same financial documents each reporting cycle.

Creating a consistent monthly routine can make the process significantly smoother.

For example:

  • Schedule time each month to gather statements.

  • Respond promptly to document requests.

  • Provide complete information before month-end close.

  • Designate a backup staff member when possible.

When documentation arrives late, month-end close is delayed.

When month-end is delayed, financial reporting is delayed.

Accurate financial reporting depends on timely communication from everyone involved.

A Budget Isn't Just an Annual Exercise

Budget-to-Actual Reporting Creates Better Decisions

One of the strongest messages from this discussion is that budgets should never become documents that sit untouched after board approval.

A budget is meant to be used throughout the year.

Budget-to-actual reporting helps organizations understand:

  • Whether spending is on track

  • If revenue goals are being met

  • Where surpluses or shortages may develop

  • Whether future initiatives are financially realistic

Without a budget, leadership has no meaningful benchmark for evaluating financial performance.

Instead of treating budgeting as an annual event, treat it as a decision-making tool that stays active throughout the year.

Delayed Responses Create Delayed Financials

Every accounting team works within deadlines.

If information needed to complete financial reports isn't received on time, financial statements can't be finalized.

It's a straightforward relationship.

Fast responses lead to faster financial reporting.

Delayed responses lead to delayed financial reporting.

For executive directors who manage multiple responsibilities, even setting aside a short block of time each month to respond to accounting requests can make a significant difference.

If possible, assigning another staff member to assist with financial communications can also help keep reporting on schedule.

Growth Requires Better Financial Processes

Scaling a Nonprofit Means Strengthening Operations

Many organizations hope that financial challenges will naturally disappear as they grow.

In reality, growth often magnifies existing weaknesses.

The processes that supported a smaller organization may not support a much larger one.

As nonprofits expand, they need stronger:

  • Documentation practices

  • Approval processes

  • Internal controls

  • Reporting procedures

  • Financial oversight

Operational excellence doesn't happen automatically.

It becomes part of an organization's culture through intentional systems and continuous improvement.

Growth without stronger processes simply creates larger problems.

Financial Reports Can Only Be Built From Complete Information

Accounting professionals can organize financial data.

They cannot create information that doesn't exist.

Incomplete records result in incomplete financial reporting.

This becomes especially important when managing grant funding.

Funders expect organizations to demonstrate:

  • How funds were spent

  • Supporting documentation

  • Clear financial reporting

  • Appropriate financial management

If questions arise, organizations need complete records to support every transaction.

When additional expertise is needed, seeking guidance early is far easier than trying to reconstruct missing information later.

Audit Readiness Should Be a Year-Round Process

Waiting until an audit is scheduled to organize financial records creates unnecessary pressure.

Strong organizations prepare throughout the year.

That preparation isn't only helpful for annual audits.

Funders may also request financial information unexpectedly.

Maintaining organized records, complete documentation, and current financial reporting throughout the year makes those requests far less stressful.

Being audit-ready isn't about reacting quickly.

It's about staying prepared consistently.

Key Takeaway: Things I'd Tell You as a Nonprofit Controller Start With Strong Financial Processes

The biggest things I'd tell you as a nonprofit controller aren't really about accounting.

They're about discipline.

The organizations that build strong financial operations aren't necessarily the ones with the largest budgets or the most resources.

They're the ones that consistently review their financials, communicate with their accounting teams, maintain documentation, follow their budgets, strengthen their internal processes, and prepare before problems become emergencies.

Every challenge discussed here is fixable.

And every improvement starts with building better habits around financial management.

Ready to Strengthen Your Financial Operations?

Financial clarity doesn't happen by accident.

It comes from consistent processes, timely communication, and leadership that treats financial management as an ongoing responsibility—not just something that matters during grant season or audit time.

If you're ready to build stronger financial systems, improve reporting, and create processes that support sustainable growth, start by evaluating where your current financial habits can become stronger. Small improvements today can create lasting stability for your organization.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page